Smith.ai pricing: AI calls, human service and Revo

01 / Provider pricing review

Read the published offer in its own billing unit

The AI Free plan lists 25 calls for $0 monthly, then $3 per extra call. The baseline Pro option is $150 for 75 calls, with $2.50 extra calls; baseline Enterprise is $500 for 300, with $2.17 extras. These are call allowances, not minute bundles. AI scheduling is listed; confirm your calendar and live-escalation terms.

02 / Provider pricing review

Match the service to your office decision

For a remodeling company, a long project inquiry and a short appointment change can each use a call. That makes call count useful, but it does not tell you whether the caller received the right answer. Keep new estimates, existing projects and supplier calls separate when testing. If a human must handle a particular request, confirm the handoff and its billing before selecting the AI tier.

03 / Provider pricing review

Work through a home-service example

Illustrative arithmetic: 100 billable calls on baseline AI Pro cost $212.50 before other applicable charges: $150 plus 25 extra calls at $2.50. This is a workload example, not a quote or a forecast. Do not apply this AI calculation to the separately priced human receptionist service.

04 / Provider pricing review

Resolve these points before choosing

Use the same requested tasks in every proposal. A rate card describes an offer; a representative call test shows whether the configured flow does the work your office needs.

05 / Provider pricing review

Compare with Revo using the same workload

Review Revo’s current plans and included minutes through the Pricing link. Compare the required answering, booking and team-handoff workflow with that exact plan, rather than assuming every feature is included in its entry tier. Record calls, handled minutes and required tasks together before comparing differently metered services.

For a practical shortlist, test a new inquiry, an appointment change and a request that needs a person. Check the final calendar or message, the handoff result and the usage charged. These are suggested evaluation steps, not customer results or a claim that either provider will complete every request.

06 / Provider pricing review

When one operating model fits better

Smith.ai belongs on the shortlist when its AI call allowance or separately agreed human involvement fits your intake requirements. A human-first package should be evaluated when your requirement is a person conducting the conversation, rather than treating it as the same AI plan.

Revo belongs on the shortlist when its published minute plans and confirmed setup fit the required answering and handoff work. Crew/Fleet features should not be attributed to Solo. Neither an included call nor an included minute guarantees a booked job.